teaching/scientificComputing
Archived
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

[projects] little updates

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jan Benda
2019-01-11 14:07:34 +01:00
parent ae51f8c3e1
commit e826428446
7 changed files with 38 additions and 27 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
projects/project_fano_slope/fano_slope.tex
View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt,pdftex]{exam}
\newcommand{\ptitle}{Stimulus discrimination}
\newcommand{\ptitle}{Stimulus discrimination: gain}
\input{../header.tex}
\firstpagefooter{Supervisor: Jan Benda}{phone: 29 74573}%
{email: jan.benda@uni-tuebingen.de}
@@ -95,10 +95,11 @@ spikes = lifboltzmanspikes(trials, input, tmax, gain);
the neuron? Plot them for the four different values of the gain
used in (a).
\part Think about a measure based on the spike-count histograms
that quantifies how well the two stimuli can be distinguished
based on the spike counts. Plot the dependence of this measure as
a function of the gain of the neuron.
\part \label{discrmeasure} Think about a measure based on the
spike-count histograms that quantifies how well the two stimuli
can be distinguished based on the spike counts. Plot the
dependence of this measure as a function of the gain of the
neuron.
%
For which gains can the two stimuli perfectly discriminated?
@@ -110,6 +111,11 @@ spikes = lifboltzmanspikes(trials, input, tmax, gain);
results in the best discrimination performance. How can you
quantify ``best discrimination'' performance?
\part Another way to quantify the discriminability of the spike
counts in response to the two stimuli is to apply an appropriate
statistical test and check for significant differences. How does
this compare to your findings from (\ref{discrmeasure})?
\end{parts}
\end{questions}