Added another paragraph :)
Inlcuded a pretty important paper.
This commit is contained in:
44
main.tex
44
main.tex
@@ -93,9 +93,8 @@ formalization of the underlying structures and mechanisms.
|
||||
One sensory system about which extensive information has been gathered over the
|
||||
years is the auditory system of grasshoppers~(\textit{Acrididae}). Grasshoppers
|
||||
rely on their sense of hearing primarily for intraspecific communication, which
|
||||
includes mate attraction and
|
||||
evaluation~(\bcite{helversen1972gesang}, \bcite{helversen1993absolute},
|
||||
\bcite{helversen1997recognition}), sender
|
||||
includes mate attraction and evaluation~(\bcite{helversen1972gesang},
|
||||
\bcite{helversen1993absolute}, \bcite{helversen1997recognition}), sender
|
||||
localization~(\bcite{helversen1988interaural}), courtship display~(SOURCE),
|
||||
rival deterrence~(\bcite{greenfield1993acoustic}), and loss-of-signal predator
|
||||
alarm~(SOURCE). In accordance with this rich behavioral repertoire,
|
||||
@@ -108,32 +107,37 @@ males of the species --- to potential mates within range. These songs are
|
||||
usually more characteristic of a species than morphological
|
||||
traits~(\bcite{tishechkin2016acoustic}, \bcite{tarasova2021eurasius}), which
|
||||
can vary greatly within species~(\bcite{rowell1972variable},
|
||||
\bcite{kohler2017morphological}). The reliance on acoustic signals to mediate
|
||||
reproduction represents a strong evolutionary driving force, that resulted in a
|
||||
massive species diversification~(\bcite{vedenina2011speciation},
|
||||
\bcite{kohler2017morphological}). The reliance on songs to mediate reproduction
|
||||
represents a strong evolutionary driving force, that resulted in a massive
|
||||
species diversification~(\bcite{vedenina2011speciation},
|
||||
\bcite{sevastianov2023evolution}), with over 6800 recognized grasshopper
|
||||
species in the \textit{Acrididae} family~(\bcite{cigliano2024orthoptera}). It
|
||||
is this diversity of species, and the crucial role of acoustic communication in
|
||||
its emergence, that makes the grasshopper auditory system an intriguing
|
||||
candidate for attempting to construct a functional model framework. For
|
||||
simplicity, we focus on the pathway responsible for the recognition of
|
||||
species-specific calling songs, disregarding other auditory functions such as
|
||||
directional hearing~(\bcite{helversen1984parallel}, \bcite{ronacher1986routes},
|
||||
candidate for attempting to construct a functional model framework. As a
|
||||
necessary reduction, the model we propose here focuses on the pathway
|
||||
responsible for the recognition of species-specific calling songs, disregarding
|
||||
other auditory functions such as directional
|
||||
hearing~(\bcite{helversen1984parallel}, \bcite{ronacher1986routes},
|
||||
\bcite{helversen1988interaural}).
|
||||
|
||||
The characteristic calling songs are
|
||||
produced by stridulation, during which the grasshopper pulls the serrated
|
||||
stridulatory file on its hindlegs across a resonating vein on the
|
||||
To understand the functional challenges faced by the grasshopper auditory
|
||||
system, one has to understand the properties of the songs it is designed to
|
||||
recognize. Grasshopper songs are amplitude-modulated broad-band acoustic
|
||||
signals. Most songs are produced by stridulation, during which the animal pulls
|
||||
the serrated stridulatory file on its hindlegs across a resonating vein on the
|
||||
forewings~(\bcite{helversen1977stridulatory}, \bcite{stumpner1994song},
|
||||
\bcite{helversen1997recognition}).
|
||||
\bcite{helversen1997recognition}). Every tooth that strikes the vein generates
|
||||
a brief pulse of sound. Multiple pulses make up a syllable; and the alternation
|
||||
of syllables and relatively quiet pauses forms a characteristic, through noisy,
|
||||
waveform pattern. Species-specific song recognition depends on certain temporal
|
||||
song parameters, such as the slope of pulse
|
||||
onsets~(\bcite{helversen1993absolute}). The amplitude modulation of the song
|
||||
already carries sufficient information to allow for successful
|
||||
recognition~(\bcite{helversen1997recognition}). Since grasshoppers are
|
||||
ectotherms, the temporal structure of their songs warps with temperature.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Strong dependence on acoustic signals for ranged communication\\
|
||||
- Diverse species-specific sound repertoires and production mechanisms\\
|
||||
- Different contexts/ranges: Stridulatory, mandibular, wings, walking sounds\\
|
||||
- Mate attraction/evaluation, rival deterrence, loss-of-signal predator alarm\\
|
||||
$\rightarrow$ Elaborate acoustic behaviors co-depend on reliable auditory perception
|
||||
|
||||
Songs = Amplitude-modulated (AM) broad-band acoustic signals\\
|
||||
- Generated by stridulatory movement of hindlegs against forewings\\
|
||||
- Shorter time scales: Characteristic temporal waveform pattern\\
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user