Add coding fraction at N=1 plots, minor fixes
This commit is contained in:
parent
b265077e30
commit
0515661e58
43
main.tex
43
main.tex
@ -826,6 +826,7 @@ Previously, when we investigated the correlation between the two measures of pop
|
||||
In almost every analysis here, our results for the broadband signal are the same or at least very similar, independent of whether we apply the analysis to the whole range or just part of it.
|
||||
In particular, there was a good correlation between the noisiness of the cells measured in \sig and the improvement.
|
||||
However, for the broadband signal the neural firing rate allows no prediction of the improvement trough increased population size. This is in contrast to the narrowband signals. There, firing rate and noisiness (\sig) were very similar in their correlations to the increase in coding fraction from increased population size. We also saw a stronger influence of the firing rate on the coding fraction of a single neuron.
|
||||
\todo{Add reason for low $r^2$ for N=1 cf: It's all very flat and close to 0.}
|
||||
\notedh{what to conclude here?}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
@ -923,6 +924,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/averaged_4parts.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}%
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}%
|
||||
|
||||
@ -938,6 +943,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/averaged_4parts.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}%
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}%
|
||||
|
||||
@ -954,6 +963,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/averaged_4parts.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}%
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}%
|
||||
|
||||
@ -969,6 +982,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/averaged_4parts.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}%
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}%
|
||||
|
||||
@ -984,6 +1001,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/averaged_4parts.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}%
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}%
|
||||
|
||||
@ -998,10 +1019,17 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/averaged_4parts.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_diff_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{Experimental data for a signal with a lower cutoff frequency of 50Hz and an upper cutoff of 100Hz.
|
||||
A: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Cells are grouped in quartiles according to $\sigma$.
|
||||
B: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Each curve shows an average over the cells in one panel of A. Shaded area shows the standard deviation.
|
||||
@ -1012,8 +1040,13 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/averaged_4parts.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
@ -1028,8 +1061,13 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/averaged_4parts.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
@ -1044,8 +1082,13 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/averaged_4parts.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_sigma.pdf}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user