From 0515661e58bef2a72c9c0e5a80ab11ebfcef858a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Huben Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 18:23:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add coding fraction at N=1 plots, minor fixes --- main.tex | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) diff --git a/main.tex b/main.tex index 16c4542..8d0a80b 100644 --- a/main.tex +++ b/main.tex @@ -826,6 +826,7 @@ Previously, when we investigated the correlation between the two measures of pop In almost every analysis here, our results for the broadband signal are the same or at least very similar, independent of whether we apply the analysis to the whole range or just part of it. In particular, there was a good correlation between the noisiness of the cells measured in \sig and the improvement. However, for the broadband signal the neural firing rate allows no prediction of the improvement trough increased population size. This is in contrast to the narrowband signals. There, firing rate and noisiness (\sig) were very similar in their correlations to the increase in coding fraction from increased population size. We also saw a stronger influence of the firing rate on the coding fraction of a single neuron. +\todo{Add reason for low $r^2$ for N=1 cf: It's all very flat and close to 0.} \notedh{what to conclude here?} \begin{figure} @@ -923,6 +924,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th \centering \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/2_by_2_overview.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/averaged_4parts.pdf} + +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf} + \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}% \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}% @@ -938,6 +943,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th \centering \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/2_by_2_overview.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/averaged_4parts.pdf} + +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf} + \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}% \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/100_150/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}% @@ -954,6 +963,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th \centering \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/2_by_2_overview.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/averaged_4parts.pdf} + +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf} + \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}% \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/150_200/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}% @@ -969,6 +982,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th \centering \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/2_by_2_overview.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/averaged_4parts.pdf} + +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf} + \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}% \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/200_250/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}% @@ -984,6 +1001,10 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th \centering \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/2_by_2_overview.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/averaged_4parts.pdf} + +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf} + \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate}% \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/250_300/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_contrast}% @@ -998,10 +1019,17 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th \begin{figure} +\centering \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/2_by_2_overview.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/averaged_4parts.pdf} + +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf} + \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_sigma.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_diff_sigma.pdf} \caption{Experimental data for a signal with a lower cutoff frequency of 50Hz and an upper cutoff of 100Hz. A: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Cells are grouped in quartiles according to $\sigma$. B: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Each curve shows an average over the cells in one panel of A. Shaded area shows the standard deviation. @@ -1012,8 +1040,13 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th \end{figure} \begin{figure} +\centering \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/2_by_2_overview.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/averaged_4parts.pdf} + +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf} + \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_sigma.pdf} @@ -1028,8 +1061,13 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th \end{figure} \begin{figure} +\centering \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/2_by_2_overview.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/averaged_4parts.pdf} + +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf} + \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_sigma.pdf} @@ -1044,8 +1082,13 @@ Bottom: Same as above, but using the difference in coding fraction instead of th \end{figure} \begin{figure} +\centering \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/2_by_2_overview.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/averaged_4parts.pdf} + +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_sigma_coding_fractions_firing_rate.pdf} +\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_coding_fractions_sigma.pdf} + \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/sigma/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_firing_rate_quot_sigma.pdf}