many changes

This commit is contained in:
a.ott
2020-08-15 17:16:39 +02:00
parent f176a7db4f
commit 45aa212b8a
42 changed files with 691 additions and 83 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
\begin{thebibliography}{}
\bibitem[Benda and Herz, 2003]{benda2003universal}
Benda, J. and Herz, A.~V. (2003).
\newblock A universal model for spike-frequency adaptation.
\newblock {\em Neural computation}, 15(11):2523--2564.
\end{thebibliography}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2015/Debian)
Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011
The top-level auxiliary file: notes.aux
The style file: apalike.bst
Database file #1: ../../citations.bib
You've used 1 entry,
1935 wiz_defined-function locations,
480 strings with 3819 characters,
and the built_in function-call counts, 443 in all, are:
= -- 44
> -- 13
< -- 1
+ -- 6
- -- 4
* -- 39
:= -- 77
add.period$ -- 3
call.type$ -- 1
change.case$ -- 7
chr.to.int$ -- 1
cite$ -- 1
duplicate$ -- 14
empty$ -- 33
format.name$ -- 7
if$ -- 84
int.to.chr$ -- 1
int.to.str$ -- 0
missing$ -- 1
newline$ -- 8
num.names$ -- 3
pop$ -- 4
preamble$ -- 1
purify$ -- 7
quote$ -- 0
skip$ -- 12
stack$ -- 0
substring$ -- 45
swap$ -- 1
text.length$ -- 0
text.prefix$ -- 0
top$ -- 0
type$ -- 6
warning$ -- 0
while$ -- 4
width$ -- 0
write$ -- 15

Binary file not shown.

View File

@@ -26,27 +26,29 @@
\section{To-read}
\begin{itemize}
\item other models of P-units:
\item other models/papers to P-units:
Bastian 1981a Electrolocation I. How the electroreceptors of Apteronotus albifrons code for moving objects and other electrical stimuli
Benda abd Herz 2003
Benda et al. 2005
%Benda and Herz 2003
\cite{benda2003universal}
Chacron et al 2001, 2005
%Benda et al. 2005, 2006
Kreiman et al. 2000
%Chacron et al 2001, 2005a
Ludtke and Nelson 2006
%Kreiman et al. 2000
Nelson et al. 1997
%Ludtke and Nelson 2006
Ratman and Nelson 2000
%Nelson et al. 1997
Wessel et al 1996
%Ratman and Nelson 2000
Xu et al 1996
%Wessel et al 1996
%Xu et al 1996
\end{itemize}
@@ -59,12 +61,16 @@ Xu et al 1996
\item to mention: size range, tank conditions,
\item continuous sinusoidal electric organ discharge EOD with near constant amplitude and frequency (Moortgat et al. 1998)
\item continuous sinusoidal electric organ discharge EOD with near constant amplitude and frequency (Moortgat et al. 1998)
\item EOD carrier signal for AMs caused by nearby objects like prey or other electric fish
\end{itemize}
\subsection{general P-unit notes}
\begin{itemize}
\item consist of 25-40 receptor cells and a nerve fiber that makes synaptic contact to at least 16 active neurotransmitter release sites per receptor cell. (M.V.L. Bennett, C. Sandri, K. Akert, Fine Structure of the tuberous electroreceptor of the high-frequency electric "sh Sternachus albifrons (gymnotiformes), J. Neurocytol. 18 (1989) 265.)
\item most abundant tuberous receptor
\item spikes in probabilistic manner to upward phase of eod
@@ -75,6 +81,8 @@ Xu et al 1996
\item can predict up to 80\% of the AM using reverse correlation and coherence but no obvious decoding mechanism
\item linear coders of intensity, additive noise models are suitable Gussin et al. 2007
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Coding}
@@ -84,9 +92,17 @@ Xu et al 1996
\begin{itemize}
\item sample descriptions in: Hernriettes phd, Gussin 2007,
\item sample descriptions in: Hernriettes phd, Gussin et al. 2007, Benda et al. 2005
\end{itemize}
\section{Mat\&Met}
\subsection{model construction}
\begin{itemize}
\item explain why adaption current and not a dynamic threshold: chosen AC other possibilities(dyn. thresh. voltage hyperpol.) why AC is better.
\end{itemize}
\section{Paper}
@@ -109,7 +125,21 @@ then more sophisticated methods like spike-triggered stimulus averages (STA) are
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Simple models of bursting and non-bursting P-type electroreceptors}
Maurice J. Chacron, Andre H Longtin , Leonard Maler, 2001
\begin{itemize}
\item simple math. model of P-units for just the baseline behavior.
\item uses dynamic threshold, abs refractory period, for bursty cells added a delayed depolarization current
\item wasn't "fitted" to data just compared, chosen and fixed(?) parameters
\end{itemize}
\bibliography{../../citations}
\bibliographystyle{apalike}
\end{document}