\documentclass[12pt,a4paper,pdftex]{exam} \newcommand{\exercisetopic}{Gradient descent} \newcommand{\exercisenum}{9} \newcommand{\exercisedate}{December 22th, 2020} \input{../../exercisesheader} \firstpagefooter{Prof. Dr. Jan Benda}{}{jan.benda@uni-tuebingen.de} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{document} \input{../../exercisestitle} \begin{questions} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \question \qt{Read sections 8.1 -- 8.5 of chapter 8 on ``optimization and gradient descent!}\vspace{-3ex} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \question \qt{Fitting the time constant of an exponential function} Let's assume we record the membrane potential from a photoreceptor neuron. We define the resting potential of the neuron to be at 0\,mV. By means of a brief current injection we increase the membrane potential by exactly 1\,mV. We then record how the membrane potential decays exponentially down to the resting potential. We are interested in the membrane time constant and therefore want to fit an exponential function to the recorded time course of the membrane potential. \begin{parts} \part Implement (and document!) the exponential function \begin{equation} \label{expfunc} x(t) = e^{-t/\tau} \quad , \qquad \tau \in \reZ \end{equation} with the membrane time constant $\tau$ as a matlab function \code{expdecay(t, tau)} that takes as arguments a vector of time points and the value of the membrane time constant. The function returns \eqnref{expfunc} computed for each time point as a vector. \begin{solution} \lstinputlisting{expdecay.m} \end{solution} \part Let's first generate the data. Set the membrane time constant to 10\,ms. Generate a time vector with sample times between zero and six times the membrane time constant and a sampling interval of 0.05\,ms. Then compute a vector containing the corresponding measurements of the membrane potential using the \code{expdecay()} function and adding some measurement noise with a standard deviation of 0.05\.mV (\code{randn()} function). Plot the data. \begin{solution} \lstinputlisting{expdecaydata.m} \end{solution} \part Implement the gradient descent algorithm for finding the least squares for the exponential function \eqref{expfunc}. The function takes as arguments the measured data, an initial value for the estimation of the membrane time constant, the $\epsilon$ factor, and the threshold for the length of the gradient where to terminate the algorithm. The function should return the estimated membrane time constant at the minimum of the mean squared error, and a vector with the time constants as well as a vector with the mean squared errors for each step of the algorithm. \begin{solution} \lstinputlisting{expdecaydescent.m} \end{solution} \part Call the gradient descent function with the generated data. Watch the value of the gradient and of tau and adapt $\epsilon$ and the threshold accordingly (they differ quite dramatically from the ones in the script for the cubic fit). \part Generate three plots: (i) the values of the time constant for each iteration step, (ii) the mean squared error for each iteration step, and (iii) the measured data and the fitted exponential function. \newsolutionpage \begin{solution} \lstinputlisting{expdecayplot.m} \includegraphics{expdecayplot} \end{solution} \end{parts} \continuepage %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \question \qt{Read sections 8.6 -- 8.8 of chapter 8 on ``optimization and gradient descent!}\vspace{-3ex} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \question \qt{Fitting an exponential function with two parameters} Usually we do not know the exact value of the voltage step. So let's make this a paramter, too: \begin{equation} \label{exp2func} x(t) = c e^{-t/\tau} \quad , \qquad c, \tau \in \reZ \end{equation} \begin{parts} \part Implement the exponential function \eqref{exp2func} as a matlab function \code{exp2func(t, p)} that takes as arguments a vector of time points and a vector with the two parameter values $c$ and $\tau$. The function returns \eqnref{exp2func} computed for each time point as a vector. \begin{solution} \lstinputlisting{exp2func.m} \end{solution} \part Plot the error surface, the mean squared error, for a range of values for the two parameters $c$ and $\tau$. Try the \code{surface()}, the \code{contour()} as well as the \code{contourf()} functions to visualize the error surface for the data from the previous exercise. You may also want to try to plot the logarithm of the mean squared error. \begin{solution} \lstinputlisting{exp2errorsurface.m} \end{solution} \newsolutionpage \part Implement the gradient descent algorithm for finding the least squares of an arbitrary function. The function takes as arguments the measured data, a vector holding the initial values of the function parameters, the $\epsilon$ factor, and the threshold for the length of the gradient where to terminate the algorithm. The function should return the estimated parameter values in a vector, and a 2D vector with the parameter values as well as a vector with the mean squared errors for each step of the algorithm. \begin{solution} \lstinputlisting{gradientdescent.m} \end{solution} \part Call the gradient descent function with the generated data. Set $\epsilon=1.0$ and the threshold value initially to 0.001. \part Plot the path of the gradient descent algorithm into the error surface. Why appears (potentially) the path of the gradient descent algorithm not perpendicular to the contour lines of the error surface? \part Plot the data together with the fitted exponential function. \part Then adapt $\epsilon$ and the threshold value to improve the convergence of the algortihm to the minimum of the cost function. \begin{solution} \lstinputlisting{exp2plot.m} \includegraphics{exp2plot} \end{solution} \part Use the function \code{lsqcurvefit()} provided by matlab to find $c$ and $\tau$ for the exponential function describing the data. Compare the resulting fit parameters of this function with the ones of your gradient descent algorithm. Plot the data together with the fitted exponential function. \begin{solution} \lstinputlisting{exp2fit.m} \includegraphics{exp2fit}\\ Resulting values for $c$ and $\tau$ are similar but not identical. \end{solution} \end{parts} \end{questions} \end{document}