final fixes
This commit is contained in:
parent
3af1c4110a
commit
d10d67b039
@ -8,21 +8,21 @@
|
||||
\vspace{1ex}
|
||||
|
||||
The {\bf code} and the {\bf presentation} should be uploaded to
|
||||
ILIAS at latest on Wednesday, February 8th, 23:59h. We will
|
||||
ILIAS at latest on Thursday, February 9th, 12:59h. We will
|
||||
store all presentations on one computer to allow fast
|
||||
transitions between talks. The presentations start on
|
||||
Thursday 9:00h. Please hand in your presentation as a pdf file. Bundle
|
||||
everything (the pdf, the code, and the data) into a {\em
|
||||
single} zip-file.
|
||||
transitions between talks. The presentations start on Thursday,
|
||||
February 9th at 1:00h c.t.. Please hand in your presentation as
|
||||
a pdf file. Bundle everything (the pdf, the code, and the data)
|
||||
into a {\em single} zip-file.
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{1ex}
|
||||
|
||||
The {\bf code} should be exectuable without any further
|
||||
adjustments from our side. A single {\em main} script should
|
||||
The {\bf code} should be executable without any further
|
||||
adjustments from our side. A single \texttt{main.m} script should
|
||||
coordinate the analysis by calling functions and sub-scripts and
|
||||
should produce the {\em same} figures that you use in your
|
||||
slides. The code should be properly commented and comprehensible
|
||||
by a third persons (use proper and consistent variable and
|
||||
by a third person (use proper and consistent variable and
|
||||
function names).
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{1ex}
|
||||
@ -34,11 +34,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
The {\bf presentation} should be {\em at most} 10min long and be
|
||||
held in English. In the presentation you should (i) briefly
|
||||
describe the problem, (ii) explain how you solved it
|
||||
algorithmically (don't show your entire code), and (iii) present
|
||||
figures showing your results. All data-related figures you show
|
||||
in the presentation should be produced by your program. It is
|
||||
always a good idea to illustrate the problem with basic plots of
|
||||
the raw-data.
|
||||
|
||||
describe the problem, (ii) present figures introducing, showing,
|
||||
and discussing your results, and (iii) explain how you solved
|
||||
the problem algorithmically (don't show your entire code). All
|
||||
data-related figures you show in the presentation should be
|
||||
produced by your program. It is always a good idea to illustrate
|
||||
the problem with basic plots of the raw-data. Make sure the axis
|
||||
labels are large enough!
|
||||
}}
|
||||
|
@ -36,10 +36,10 @@
|
||||
respond to bars in dependence on their orientation.
|
||||
|
||||
How is the orientation of a bar encoded by the activity of a
|
||||
population of orientation sensisitive neurons?
|
||||
population of orientation sensitive neurons?
|
||||
|
||||
In an electrophysiological experiment, 6 neurons have been recorded
|
||||
simultaneously. First, the tuning of these neurons was characteried
|
||||
simultaneously. First, the tuning of these neurons was characterized
|
||||
by presenting them bars in a range of 12 orientation angles. Each
|
||||
orientation was presented 50 times. Each of the \texttt{unit*.mat}
|
||||
files contains the responses of one of the neurons. In there,
|
||||
@ -76,14 +76,24 @@
|
||||
gain factor that sets the maximum firing rate.
|
||||
|
||||
\part How can the orientation angle of the presented bar be read
|
||||
out from the population activity of the 6 neurons? One is the so
|
||||
called ``population vector''. Think of another (simpler) method.
|
||||
out from one trial of the population activity of the 6 neurons?
|
||||
One is the so called ``population vector'' where unit vectors
|
||||
pointing into the direction of the maximum response of each neuron
|
||||
are weighted by their firing rate. The stimulus orientation is
|
||||
then the direction of the averaged vectors.
|
||||
|
||||
Load one of the \texttt{population*.mat} files, illustrate the data,
|
||||
and estimate the orientation angle of the bar by two different methods.
|
||||
Think of another (simpler) method how the orientation of the bar
|
||||
may be approximately read out from the population.
|
||||
|
||||
Load one of the \texttt{population*.mat} files, illustrate the
|
||||
data, and estimate the orientation angle of the bar by the two
|
||||
different methods.
|
||||
|
||||
\part Compare, illustrate and discuss the performance of your two
|
||||
decoding methods.
|
||||
decoding methods by using all of the recorded responses (all
|
||||
\texttt{population*.mat} files). How exactly is the orientation of
|
||||
the bar encoded? How robust is the estimate of the orientation
|
||||
from trial to trial?
|
||||
\end{parts}
|
||||
\end{questions}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user