[projects] minor fixes, change supervisor for some projects
This commit is contained in:
parent
ea8a4922a4
commit
b55b5789dd
@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\ptitle}{Adaptation time-constant}
|
||||
\input{../header.tex}
|
||||
\firstpagefooter{Supervisor: Jan Grewe}{phone: 29 74588}%
|
||||
{email: jan.grewe@uni-tuebingen.de}
|
||||
\firstpagefooter{Supervisor: Lukas Sonnenberg}{phone:}%
|
||||
{email: lukas.sonnenberg@uni-tuebingen.de}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -56,8 +56,4 @@ multiples of the fundamental frequency).
|
||||
\end{parts}
|
||||
\end{questions}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ The eyetracker recorded ey positions with 60\,Hz. The fixation point was shown a
|
||||
\begin{questions}
|
||||
\question Familiarize yourself with the data.
|
||||
\begin{parts}
|
||||
\part Cut the data in chunks belonging to the same period (fixation and free eye-movements).
|
||||
\part Cut the data into chunks belonging to the same period (fixation and free eye-movements).
|
||||
\part Detect problems in the data (e.g. the eye was not found) and correct the eye traces. Interpolate linearily in these sections.
|
||||
\end{parts}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ The eyetracker recorded ey positions with 60\,Hz. The fixation point was shown a
|
||||
\part Detect fixation points in the "free movement" part of the data.
|
||||
\end{parts}
|
||||
|
||||
\question Compare the subject's behaviour when viewing the different scenes.
|
||||
\question Compare the subject's behavior when viewing the different scenes.
|
||||
\end{questions}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\ptitle}{f-I curves}
|
||||
\input{../header.tex}
|
||||
\firstpagefooter{Supervisor: Jan Benda}{phone: 29 74573}%
|
||||
{email: jan.benda@uni-tuebingen.de}
|
||||
\firstpagefooter{Supervisor: Jan Grewe}{phone: 29 74588}%
|
||||
{email: jan.grewe@uni-tuebingen.de}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -12,16 +12,15 @@
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Questions %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\section*{Light responses of an insect photoreceptor.}
|
||||
In this project you will analyze data from intracellular recordings of
|
||||
a fly R\,1--6 photoreceptor. These cells show graded membrane
|
||||
potential changes in response to a light stimulus. The membrane
|
||||
potential of the photoreceptor was recorded while the cell was
|
||||
stimulated with a light stimulus.
|
||||
Fly R\,1--6 photoreceptors respond to light-on stimuli with graded membrane
|
||||
potential changes. In the acompanying datasets you find the membrane
|
||||
potential of a single R\,1-6 photoreceptor that was recorded while the receptor was
|
||||
stimulated with a light stimulus of different amplitudes.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{questions}
|
||||
\question{} The accompanying dataset (photoreceptor\_data.zip)
|
||||
contains seven mat files. Each of these holds the data from one
|
||||
stimulus intensity and contains therr variables. (i)
|
||||
stimulus intensity and contains three variables. (i)
|
||||
\textit{voltage} a matrix with the recorded membrane potential from
|
||||
10 consecutive trials, (ii) \textit{time} a matrix with the
|
||||
time-axis for each trial, and (iii) \textit{trace\_meta} a structure
|
||||
@ -36,8 +35,8 @@ stimulated with a light stimulus.
|
||||
the individual responses as a function of time.
|
||||
|
||||
\part Intracellular recordings often suffer from drifts in the resting
|
||||
potential. This leads to a large variability in the responses which is technical and not a cellular
|
||||
property. To compensate for such drifts trials are aligned to the
|
||||
potential. This leads to a large variability in the responses which has technical reasons and is not a cellular
|
||||
property. To compensate for such drifts trials usually are aligned to the
|
||||
resting potential before stimulus onset.
|
||||
Replot the data but with the compensation for the drifts.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -46,9 +45,9 @@ stimulated with a light stimulus.
|
||||
|
||||
\part You will notice that the responses have three main parts, (i) a
|
||||
pre-stimulus phase, (ii) the phase in which the light was on, and (iii)
|
||||
a post-stimulus phase. Create an characteristic curve that
|
||||
a post-stimulus phase. The light-on phase can further be devided into two parts, the onset, and the "steady state" response part. Create an characteristic curve that
|
||||
plots the response strength as a function of the stimulus
|
||||
intensity for the ``onset'' and the ``steady state''
|
||||
intensity for ``onset'' and ``steady state''
|
||||
phases of the light response.
|
||||
|
||||
\part The light switches on at time zero. Estimate the delay
|
||||
|
@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\ptitle}{Random walk}
|
||||
\input{../header.tex}
|
||||
\firstpagefooter{Supervisor: Jan Grewe}{phone: 29 74588}%
|
||||
{email: jan.grewe@uni-tuebingen.de}
|
||||
\firstpagefooter{Supervisor: Lukas Sonnenberg}{phone:}%
|
||||
{email: lukas.sonnenberg@uni-tuebingen.de}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -51,4 +51,4 @@ a random walk and changes directions randomly.
|
||||
\end{parts}
|
||||
\end{questions}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
\end{document}
|
@ -11,27 +11,29 @@
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Questions %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\section*{Reverse reconstruction of the stimulus that evoked a neuronal response.}
|
||||
To analyse the encoding properties of a neuron one often calculates the
|
||||
Spike-Triggered-Average (STA). The STA is the average stimulus that
|
||||
When analyzing neuronal responses we want to figure out which aspects of the stimulus are actually encoded in the neuronal response.
|
||||
One way to do this is to calculate the
|
||||
Spike-Triggered-Average (STA) and use it to reversely estimate which aspects of the stimulus are encoded in the resopnse.
|
||||
|
||||
The STA is the average stimulus that
|
||||
led to a spike in the neuron:
|
||||
\[ STA(\tau) = \frac{1}{n} \displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{n}{s(t_i - \tau)} \]
|
||||
where $n$ is the number of spikes and $t_i$ is the time of the
|
||||
$i_{th}$ spike. $\tau$ is a temporal shift relative to the spike
|
||||
time. For the beginning let $\tau$ assume values in the range
|
||||
$\pm50$\,ms. The STA can be estimated by cutting out snippets from the
|
||||
time.
|
||||
|
||||
Another approach to understand the equation is to cut out snippets from the
|
||||
stimulus that are centered on the respective spike time and by
|
||||
subsequently averaging these stimulus snippets. The STA can be used to
|
||||
reconstruct the stimulus from the neuronal response (reverse
|
||||
reconstruction). The reconstructed stimulus can then be compared to
|
||||
the original stimulus and provides a good impression about the
|
||||
features that are encoded in the neuronal response.
|
||||
subsequently averaging these stimulus snippets.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{questions}
|
||||
\question In the accompanying data files you find the spike
|
||||
responses of a p-type electroreceptor afferent (P-unit) and a
|
||||
pyramidal neuron recorded in the hindbrain of the weakly electric
|
||||
fish \textit{Apteronotus leptorhynchus}. The respective stimuli are
|
||||
stored in separate files. The neron is stimulated with an amplitude
|
||||
stored in separate files. The neuron is stimulated with an amplitude
|
||||
modulation of the fish's own electric field. The stored stimulus
|
||||
trace is the modulator that is applied to the field and is
|
||||
dimensionless, i.e. it has no unit. The data is sampled with
|
||||
@ -39,7 +41,15 @@ features that are encoded in the neuronal response.
|
||||
seconds. Start with the P-unit and, in the end, apply the same
|
||||
analyzes/functions to the pyramidal cell.
|
||||
\begin{parts}
|
||||
\part Estimate the STA and plot it. What does it tell?
|
||||
\part Familiarize yourself with the cellular responses and the stimulus.
|
||||
\part Estimate the STA and plot it. For the beginning let $\tau$ assume values in the range
|
||||
$\pm50$\,ms. What does it tell?
|
||||
\end{parts}
|
||||
\question The STA can be used to reconstruct the stimulus from the neuronal response (reverse
|
||||
reconstruction) by convolution of the spiking response with the STA. The reconstructed stimulus can then be compared to
|
||||
the original stimulus and provides a good impression about the
|
||||
features that are encoded in the neuronal response.
|
||||
\begin{parts}
|
||||
\part Implement a function that does the reverse reconstruction and uses the STA to reconstruct the stimulus.
|
||||
\part Implement a function that estimates the reconstruction quality.
|
||||
\part Test the robustness of the reconstruction: Estimate
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user