Updated projects
This commit is contained in:
parent
cdd40dc3a7
commit
b35365232d
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ spikes = lifboltzmanspikes( trials, input, tmax, Dnoise, imax, ithresh, slope );
|
||||
|
||||
Think of calling the \texttt{lifboltzmanspikes()} function as a
|
||||
simple way of doing an electrophysiological experiment. You are
|
||||
presenting a stimulus of constant intensity $I$ that you set. The
|
||||
presenting a stimulus with a constant intensity $I$ that you set. The
|
||||
neuron responds to this stimulus, and you record this
|
||||
response. After detecting the timepoints of the spikes in your
|
||||
recordings you get what the \texttt{lifboltzmanspikes()} function
|
||||
@ -101,20 +101,22 @@ spikes = lifboltzmanspikes( trials, input, tmax, Dnoise, imax, ithresh, slope );
|
||||
differrent stimuli.
|
||||
|
||||
\part Measure the tuning curve of the neuron with respect to the
|
||||
input. That is, compute the mean firing rate (number of spikes within the recording time \texttt{tmax} divided by \texttt{tmax}) as a function of the
|
||||
input strength. Find an appropriate range of input values. Do
|
||||
this for different values of the \texttt{slope} parameter (values
|
||||
between 0.1 and 2.0).
|
||||
|
||||
\part Generate histograms of the spike counts within $W=200$\,ms
|
||||
of the responses to the two differrent stimuli $I_1$ and
|
||||
$I_2$. How do they depend on the slope of the tuning curve of the
|
||||
neuron?
|
||||
input. That is, compute the mean firing rate (number of spikes
|
||||
within the recording time \texttt{tmax} divided by \texttt{tmax}
|
||||
and averaged over trials) as a function of the input
|
||||
strength. Find an appropriate range of input values. Do this for
|
||||
different values of the \texttt{slope} parameter (values between
|
||||
0.1 and 2.0).
|
||||
|
||||
\part For the two differrent stimuli $I_1$ and $I_2$ generate
|
||||
histograms of the spike counts of the evoked responses within all
|
||||
windows of $W=200$\,ms width. How do the histograms of the spike
|
||||
counts depend on the slope of the tuning curve of the neuron?
|
||||
|
||||
\part Think about a measure based on the spike count histograms
|
||||
that quantifies how well the two stimuli can be distinguished
|
||||
based on the spike counts. Plot the dependence of this measure as
|
||||
a function of the observation time $W$.
|
||||
a function of the observation time $W$ (width of the windows).
|
||||
|
||||
For which slopes can the two stimuli be well discriminated?
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -79,6 +79,17 @@ spikes = lifadaptspikes( trials, input, tmax, Dnoise, adapttau, adaptincr );
|
||||
elements, each being a vector of spike times (in seconds) computed
|
||||
for a duration of \texttt{tmax} seconds.
|
||||
|
||||
Think of calling the \texttt{lifadaptspikes()} function as a
|
||||
simple way of doing an electrophysiological experiment. You are
|
||||
presenting a stimulus with a constant intensity $I$ that you set. The
|
||||
neuron responds to this stimulus, and you record this
|
||||
response. After detecting the timepoints of the spikes in your
|
||||
recordings you get what the \texttt{lifadaptspikes()} function
|
||||
returns. The advantage over real data is, that you have the
|
||||
possibility to simply modify the properties of the neuron via the
|
||||
\texttt{Dnoise}, \texttt{adapttau}, and
|
||||
\texttt{adaptincr} parameter.
|
||||
|
||||
For the two inputs $I_1$ and $I_2$ use
|
||||
\begin{lstlisting}
|
||||
input = 65.0; % I_1
|
||||
|
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
|
||||
as a current $I$ injected via a patch-electrode into the neuron).
|
||||
|
||||
Measure the tuning curve (also called the intensity-response curve) of the
|
||||
neuron. That is, what is the firing rate of the neuron's response
|
||||
neuron. That is, what is the mean firing rate of the neuron's response
|
||||
as a function of the input $I$. How does this depend on the level of
|
||||
the intrinsic noise of the neuron?
|
||||
|
||||
@ -74,9 +74,22 @@ spikes = lifspikes( trials, input, tmax, Dnoise );
|
||||
of spike times (in seconds) computed for a duration of \texttt{tmax} seconds.
|
||||
The input is set via the \texttt{input} variable, the noise strength via \texttt{Dnoise}.
|
||||
|
||||
Think of calling the \texttt{lifspikes()} function as a
|
||||
simple way of doing an electrophysiological experiment. You are
|
||||
presenting a stimulus with a constant intensity $I$ that you set. The
|
||||
neuron responds to this stimulus, and you record this
|
||||
response. After detecting the timepoints of the spikes in your
|
||||
recordings you get what the \texttt{lifspikes()} function
|
||||
returns. The advantage over real data is, that you have the
|
||||
possibility to simply modify the properties of the neuron via the
|
||||
\texttt{Dnoise} parameter.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{parts}
|
||||
\part First set the noise \texttt{Dnoise=0} (no noise). Compute and plot the firing rate
|
||||
as a function of the input for inputs ranging from 0 to 20.
|
||||
\part First set the noise \texttt{Dnoise=0} (no noise). Compute
|
||||
and plot the mean firing rate (number of spikes within the
|
||||
recording time \texttt{tmax} divided by \texttt{tmax} and averaged
|
||||
over trials) as a function of the input for inputs ranging from 0
|
||||
to 20.
|
||||
|
||||
\part Do the same for various noise strength \texttt{Dnoise}. Use $D_{noise} = 1e-3$,
|
||||
1e-2, and 1e-1. How does the intrinsic noise influence the response curve?
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user