[projects] last minute changes
This commit is contained in:
parent
dac100edeb
commit
5b132d530d
projects
@ -16,20 +16,21 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
In the temporal lobe of primates you can find neurons that respond
|
In the temporal lobe of primates you can find neurons that respond
|
||||||
selectively to a certain type of object category. You may have heard
|
selectively to a certain type of object category. You may have heard
|
||||||
stories about the famous grandmother neurons which are supposed to
|
about the famous grandmother neuron which is supposed to respond
|
||||||
respond exclusively when the subject perceives a particular
|
exclusively when the subject sees a particular person, i.e. the
|
||||||
person. Even though the existence of a grandmother neuron in the
|
grandmother. Even though the existence of a grandmother neuron in the
|
||||||
strict sense is implausible, the concept exemplifies the observation
|
strict sense is implausible, the concept exemplifies the observation
|
||||||
that sensory neurons within the ventral visual stream are tuned to
|
that sensory neurons within the ventral visual stream are tuned to
|
||||||
certain stimuli types. One of the most important and first visual
|
certain stimulus types. One of the most important and first visual
|
||||||
stimulus the newborn typically perceives is the mother's face. It is
|
stimulus the newborn typically sees is the mother's face. It is
|
||||||
believed that the early ubiquity of faces and their importance for
|
believed that the early ubiquity of faces and their importance for
|
||||||
social interactions triggers the development of the so called
|
social interactions triggers the development of the so called
|
||||||
face-patch system within the temporal lobe of primates.\par
|
face-patch system within the temporal lobe of primates.\par Your task
|
||||||
Your task here will be to estimate the \textit{selectivity index}
|
here will be to estimate the \textit{face selectivity index} ($FSI$)
|
||||||
($SI$) of neurons that were recorded in the superior temporal sulcus
|
of neurons that were recorded in the superior temporal sulcus of a
|
||||||
of a rhesus monkey during the visual presentation of objects of different
|
rhesus monkey during the visual presentation of objects of different
|
||||||
categories.
|
categories (data courtesy of the Sensorymotor-Lab, Hertie
|
||||||
|
Institute).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{questions}
|
\begin{questions}
|
||||||
@ -66,8 +67,8 @@ categories.
|
|||||||
this individually for each trial and average afterwards in order
|
this individually for each trial and average afterwards in order
|
||||||
to obtain the standard deviation of the firing rates. Plot the
|
to obtain the standard deviation of the firing rates. Plot the
|
||||||
firing rates and their standard deviations on top of the raster
|
firing rates and their standard deviations on top of the raster
|
||||||
plots. Which of the methods appears to be a better representation
|
plots. Which of the methods appears best to represent
|
||||||
of the spike rasters?
|
the spiking activity seen in the raster plots?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\part
|
\part
|
||||||
Generate figures that show for each neuron the firing rates
|
Generate figures that show for each neuron the firing rates
|
||||||
@ -79,17 +80,17 @@ categories.
|
|||||||
modulations.
|
modulations.
|
||||||
% First, normalize each response to baseline activity
|
% First, normalize each response to baseline activity
|
||||||
% (first 400 ms). Why is the normalization useful?
|
% (first 400 ms). Why is the normalization useful?
|
||||||
% \par
|
% \par Now, determine the periods within which the neurons
|
||||||
Now, determine the periods within which the neurons activity
|
activity deviates from the baseline activity at least by
|
||||||
deviates from the baseline activity at least by $2*\sigma$. Do
|
$2*\sigma$. Do this for each object category and mark the periods
|
||||||
this for each object category and mark the periods in the plots in
|
in the plots in an appropriate way. Are there neurons that do not
|
||||||
an appropriate way. Are there also neurons that do not repond to
|
repond to the visual stimulation or exhibit inhibitory responses?
|
||||||
the visual stimulation or exhibit inhibitory responses? \par
|
\par
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\part
|
\part
|
||||||
The $SI$ gives an estimate of how strong a neuron is tuned to the
|
The $FSI$ gives an estimate of how strongly a neuron is tuned to
|
||||||
chosen object categories. It is given by the neurons response
|
the chosen object categories. It is given by the neuron's response
|
||||||
during the presentation of the one category compared to the other
|
during the presentation of the one category compared to the other
|
||||||
category.
|
category.
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
@ -97,33 +98,34 @@ categories.
|
|||||||
to category B}} } { \mu_{\text{Response to category A}} + \mu_{ \text{Response
|
to category B}} } { \mu_{\text{Response to category A}} + \mu_{ \text{Response
|
||||||
to category B} } }
|
to category B} } }
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
$SI$ can take values between -1 and 1 which indicates tuning to
|
$FSI$ can take values between -1 and 1 which indicates tuning to
|
||||||
the one or to the other category. There are different
|
the one or to the other category. There are different
|
||||||
possibilities of how it can be estimated. The easiest way would be
|
possibilities of how it can be estimated. The easiest way would be
|
||||||
to average the spike count during the whole time of stimulus
|
to average the spike count during the whole time of stimulus
|
||||||
presentation. However, if responses are phasic you will
|
presentation. However, if responses are phasic you will
|
||||||
underestimate the $SI$. Therefor, you should limit the estimate to
|
underestimate the $FSI$. Therefore, you should limit the estimate
|
||||||
periods of significant modulations. Use the periods determined in
|
to periods of significant modulations. Use the periods determined
|
||||||
(d). Store all obtained $SI$s within one variable. We are mainly
|
in (d). Store all obtained $FSI$s within a single variable. We are
|
||||||
interested to identify face-selective neurons but feel free to
|
mainly interested in identifying face-selective neurons but feel
|
||||||
test the neurons for selectivity to other categories, as well.
|
free to test the neurons for selectivity to other categories, as
|
||||||
|
well.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\part
|
\part
|
||||||
Plot the distribution of $SI$ values and describe it
|
Plot the distribution of $FSI$ values and describe it
|
||||||
qualitatively. Does it indicate a continuum or a distinct
|
qualitatively. Does it indicate a continuum or a distinct
|
||||||
population of face-selective neurons. \par
|
population of face-selective neurons. \par Think about a
|
||||||
Think about a statistical test that tells you whether a given
|
statistical test that tells you whether a given neuron is
|
||||||
neuron is significantly modulated by one or the other category
|
significantly modulated by one or the other category (try
|
||||||
(try different combinations of categories). List cells that show
|
different combinations of categories). List cells that show
|
||||||
significant modulation to faces and non-faces. Which is the
|
significant modulations to faces and non-faces. Which is the
|
||||||
minimum SI that reaches significance when choosing
|
minimum $FSI$ that reaches significance when choosing $\alpha =
|
||||||
$\alpha = 0.05$? Is it an all or nothing selectivity?
|
0.05$? Is it an all or nothing selectivity?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\part
|
\part
|
||||||
Take a look at the time resolved firing rates of the identified
|
Take a look at the time resolved firing rates of the identified
|
||||||
face-selective neurons and examine their response properties. What
|
face-selective neurons and examine their response properties. What
|
||||||
is their response-latency (choose an appropriate visualisation),
|
are their response-latencies (choose an appropriate
|
||||||
is their response phasic or tonic.
|
visualisation), are their responses phasic or tonic.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{parts}
|
\end{parts}
|
||||||
\end{questions}
|
\end{questions}
|
||||||
|
@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ In you zip file you find a natural image called {\tt natimg.jpg}.
|
|||||||
\question What could be the biological significance of that (\cite{BG} can
|
\question What could be the biological significance of that (\cite{BG} can
|
||||||
give you a clue)?
|
give you a clue)?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\question How could you transform the picture to match the true
|
||||||
|
representation in the retina (S-, M-, L- cones)?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{questions}
|
\end{questions}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{thebibliography}{1}
|
\begin{thebibliography}{1}
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user