[projects] last minute changes
This commit is contained in:
parent
dac100edeb
commit
5b132d530d
@ -16,20 +16,21 @@
|
||||
|
||||
In the temporal lobe of primates you can find neurons that respond
|
||||
selectively to a certain type of object category. You may have heard
|
||||
stories about the famous grandmother neurons which are supposed to
|
||||
respond exclusively when the subject perceives a particular
|
||||
person. Even though the existence of a grandmother neuron in the
|
||||
about the famous grandmother neuron which is supposed to respond
|
||||
exclusively when the subject sees a particular person, i.e. the
|
||||
grandmother. Even though the existence of a grandmother neuron in the
|
||||
strict sense is implausible, the concept exemplifies the observation
|
||||
that sensory neurons within the ventral visual stream are tuned to
|
||||
certain stimuli types. One of the most important and first visual
|
||||
stimulus the newborn typically perceives is the mother's face. It is
|
||||
certain stimulus types. One of the most important and first visual
|
||||
stimulus the newborn typically sees is the mother's face. It is
|
||||
believed that the early ubiquity of faces and their importance for
|
||||
social interactions triggers the development of the so called
|
||||
face-patch system within the temporal lobe of primates.\par
|
||||
Your task here will be to estimate the \textit{selectivity index}
|
||||
($SI$) of neurons that were recorded in the superior temporal sulcus
|
||||
of a rhesus monkey during the visual presentation of objects of different
|
||||
categories.
|
||||
face-patch system within the temporal lobe of primates.\par Your task
|
||||
here will be to estimate the \textit{face selectivity index} ($FSI$)
|
||||
of neurons that were recorded in the superior temporal sulcus of a
|
||||
rhesus monkey during the visual presentation of objects of different
|
||||
categories (data courtesy of the Sensorymotor-Lab, Hertie
|
||||
Institute).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{questions}
|
||||
@ -66,8 +67,8 @@ categories.
|
||||
this individually for each trial and average afterwards in order
|
||||
to obtain the standard deviation of the firing rates. Plot the
|
||||
firing rates and their standard deviations on top of the raster
|
||||
plots. Which of the methods appears to be a better representation
|
||||
of the spike rasters?
|
||||
plots. Which of the methods appears best to represent
|
||||
the spiking activity seen in the raster plots?
|
||||
|
||||
\part
|
||||
Generate figures that show for each neuron the firing rates
|
||||
@ -79,17 +80,17 @@ categories.
|
||||
modulations.
|
||||
% First, normalize each response to baseline activity
|
||||
% (first 400 ms). Why is the normalization useful?
|
||||
% \par
|
||||
Now, determine the periods within which the neurons activity
|
||||
deviates from the baseline activity at least by $2*\sigma$. Do
|
||||
this for each object category and mark the periods in the plots in
|
||||
an appropriate way. Are there also neurons that do not repond to
|
||||
the visual stimulation or exhibit inhibitory responses? \par
|
||||
% \par Now, determine the periods within which the neurons
|
||||
activity deviates from the baseline activity at least by
|
||||
$2*\sigma$. Do this for each object category and mark the periods
|
||||
in the plots in an appropriate way. Are there neurons that do not
|
||||
repond to the visual stimulation or exhibit inhibitory responses?
|
||||
\par
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\part
|
||||
The $SI$ gives an estimate of how strong a neuron is tuned to the
|
||||
chosen object categories. It is given by the neurons response
|
||||
The $FSI$ gives an estimate of how strongly a neuron is tuned to
|
||||
the chosen object categories. It is given by the neuron's response
|
||||
during the presentation of the one category compared to the other
|
||||
category.
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
@ -97,33 +98,34 @@ categories.
|
||||
to category B}} } { \mu_{\text{Response to category A}} + \mu_{ \text{Response
|
||||
to category B} } }
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
$SI$ can take values between -1 and 1 which indicates tuning to
|
||||
$FSI$ can take values between -1 and 1 which indicates tuning to
|
||||
the one or to the other category. There are different
|
||||
possibilities of how it can be estimated. The easiest way would be
|
||||
to average the spike count during the whole time of stimulus
|
||||
presentation. However, if responses are phasic you will
|
||||
underestimate the $SI$. Therefor, you should limit the estimate to
|
||||
periods of significant modulations. Use the periods determined in
|
||||
(d). Store all obtained $SI$s within one variable. We are mainly
|
||||
interested to identify face-selective neurons but feel free to
|
||||
test the neurons for selectivity to other categories, as well.
|
||||
underestimate the $FSI$. Therefore, you should limit the estimate
|
||||
to periods of significant modulations. Use the periods determined
|
||||
in (d). Store all obtained $FSI$s within a single variable. We are
|
||||
mainly interested in identifying face-selective neurons but feel
|
||||
free to test the neurons for selectivity to other categories, as
|
||||
well.
|
||||
|
||||
\part
|
||||
Plot the distribution of $SI$ values and describe it
|
||||
Plot the distribution of $FSI$ values and describe it
|
||||
qualitatively. Does it indicate a continuum or a distinct
|
||||
population of face-selective neurons. \par
|
||||
Think about a statistical test that tells you whether a given
|
||||
neuron is significantly modulated by one or the other category
|
||||
(try different combinations of categories). List cells that show
|
||||
significant modulation to faces and non-faces. Which is the
|
||||
minimum SI that reaches significance when choosing
|
||||
$\alpha = 0.05$? Is it an all or nothing selectivity?
|
||||
population of face-selective neurons. \par Think about a
|
||||
statistical test that tells you whether a given neuron is
|
||||
significantly modulated by one or the other category (try
|
||||
different combinations of categories). List cells that show
|
||||
significant modulations to faces and non-faces. Which is the
|
||||
minimum $FSI$ that reaches significance when choosing $\alpha =
|
||||
0.05$? Is it an all or nothing selectivity?
|
||||
|
||||
\part
|
||||
Take a look at the time resolved firing rates of the identified
|
||||
face-selective neurons and examine their response properties. What
|
||||
is their response-latency (choose an appropriate visualisation),
|
||||
is their response phasic or tonic.
|
||||
are their response-latencies (choose an appropriate
|
||||
visualisation), are their responses phasic or tonic.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{parts}
|
||||
\end{questions}
|
||||
|
@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ In you zip file you find a natural image called {\tt natimg.jpg}.
|
||||
\question What could be the biological significance of that (\cite{BG} can
|
||||
give you a clue)?
|
||||
|
||||
\question How could you transform the picture to match the true
|
||||
representation in the retina (S-, M-, L- cones)?
|
||||
|
||||
\end{questions}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{thebibliography}{1}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user