Jan und Fabian spellchecker
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
\documentclass[addpoints,10pt]{exam}
|
||||
\documentclass[addpoints,11pt]{exam}
|
||||
\usepackage{url}
|
||||
\usepackage{color}
|
||||
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
||||
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
|
||||
\firstpageheader{Scientific Computing}{Project Assignment}{11/05/2014
|
||||
-- 11/06/2014}
|
||||
%\runningheader{Homework 01}{Page \thepage\ of \numpages}{23. October 2014}
|
||||
\firstpagefooter{}{}{}
|
||||
\firstpagefooter{}{}{{\bf Supervisor:} Jan Benda}
|
||||
\runningfooter{}{}{}
|
||||
\pointsinmargin
|
||||
\bracketedpoints
|
||||
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
|
||||
% captionpos=t,
|
||||
xleftmargin=2em,
|
||||
xrightmargin=1em,
|
||||
% aboveskip=10pt,
|
||||
% aboveskip=11pt,
|
||||
%title=\lstname,
|
||||
% title={\protect\filename@parse{\lstname}\protect\filename@base.\protect\filename@ext}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -62,32 +62,33 @@
|
||||
duration $W$ of the observation time? How is this related to the fano factor
|
||||
(the ratio between the variance and the mean of the spike counts)?
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{parts}
|
||||
\part The neuron is implemented in the file \texttt{lifadaptspikes.m}.
|
||||
The neuron is implemented in the file \texttt{lifadaptspikes.m}.
|
||||
Call it with the following parameters:
|
||||
\begin{lstlisting}
|
||||
trials = 10;
|
||||
tmax = 50.0;
|
||||
input = 65.0;
|
||||
Dnoise = 0.1;
|
||||
adapttau = 0.2;
|
||||
adaptincr = 0.5;
|
||||
trials = 10;
|
||||
tmax = 50.0;
|
||||
input = 65.0;
|
||||
Dnoise = 0.1;
|
||||
adapttau = 0.2;
|
||||
adaptincr = 0.5;
|
||||
|
||||
spikes = lifadaptspikes( trials, input, tmax, Dnoise, adapttau, adaptincr );
|
||||
spikes = lifadaptspikes( trials, input, tmax, Dnoise, adapttau, adaptincr );
|
||||
\end{lstlisting}
|
||||
The returned \texttt{spikes} is a cell array with \texttt{trials} elements, each being a vector
|
||||
of spike times (in seconds) computed for a duration of \texttt{tmax} seconds.
|
||||
|
||||
For the two inputs $I_1$ and $I_2$ use
|
||||
\begin{lstlisting}
|
||||
input = 65.0; % I_1
|
||||
input = 75.0; % I_2
|
||||
input = 65.0; % I_1
|
||||
input = 75.0; % I_2
|
||||
\end{lstlisting}
|
||||
|
||||
Show two raster plots for the responses to the two differrent stimuli.
|
||||
\begin{parts}
|
||||
\part
|
||||
Show two raster plots for the responses to the two different stimuli.
|
||||
|
||||
\part Generate histograms of the spike counts within $W$ of the
|
||||
responses to the two differrent stimuli. How do they depend on the observation time $W$
|
||||
responses to the two different stimuli. How do they depend on the observation time $W$
|
||||
(use values between 1\,ms and 1\,s)?
|
||||
|
||||
\part Think about a measure based on the spike count histograms that quantifies how well
|
||||
@@ -96,7 +97,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
For which observation times can the two stimuli perfectly discriminated?
|
||||
|
||||
Hint: A possible readout is to set a threshold $n_{thresh}$ for
|
||||
\underline{Hint:} A possible readout is to set a threshold $n_{thresh}$ for
|
||||
the observed spike count. Any response smaller than the threshold
|
||||
assumes that the stimulus was $I_1$, any response larger than the
|
||||
threshold assumes that the stimulus was $I_2$. What is the
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user