93 lines
3.1 KiB
TeX
93 lines
3.1 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[25pt, a0paper, portrait, margin=0mm, innermargin=20mm,
|
|
blockverticalspace=2mm, colspace=20mm, subcolspace=0mm]{tikzposter} %Default values for poster format options.
|
|
|
|
\input{packages}
|
|
\input{style}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1}
|
|
\title{\parbox{1500pt}{Poster}}
|
|
\author{Sina Prause, Alexander Wendt, and Patrick Weygoldt}
|
|
\institute{Supervised by Till Raab \& Jan Benda, Neuroethology Lab, University of Tuebingen}
|
|
\usetitlestyle[]{sampletitle}
|
|
\maketitle
|
|
\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.4}
|
|
|
|
\begin{columns}
|
|
\column{0.4}
|
|
\myblock[TranspBlock]{Introduction}{
|
|
The time-frequency tradeoff makes reliable signal detecion and simultaneous
|
|
sender identification of freely interacting individuals impossible.
|
|
This profoundly limits our current understanding of chirps to experiments
|
|
with single - or physically separated - individuals.
|
|
\vspace{0.6cm}
|
|
\begin{tikzfigure}[]
|
|
\label{griddrawing}
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{example-image-a}
|
|
\end{tikzfigure}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\myblock[TranspBlock]{Chirp detection}{
|
|
\begin{tikzfigure}[]
|
|
\label{fig:example_a}
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{example-image-a}
|
|
\end{tikzfigure}
|
|
\vspace{0cm}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\column{0.6}
|
|
\myblock[TranspBlock]{Chirps during competition}{
|
|
\begin{tikzfigure}[]
|
|
\label{fig:example_b}
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{example-image-b}
|
|
\end{tikzfigure}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\myblock[TranspBlock]{Interactions at modulations}{
|
|
\vspace{-1.2cm}
|
|
\begin{tikzfigure}[]
|
|
\label{fig:example_c}
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{example-image-c}
|
|
\end{tikzfigure}
|
|
|
|
\begin{multicols}{2}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\setlength\itemsep{0.5em}
|
|
\item $\Delta$EOD$f$ does not appear to decrease during synchronous modulations ().
|
|
\item Individuals that rise their EOD$f$ first appear to rise their frequency higher compared to reactors (\textbf{B}).
|
|
\vfill
|
|
\null
|
|
\columnbreak
|
|
\item Synchronized fish keep distances below 1 m (\textbf{C}) but distances over 3 m also occur (see \textbf{movie}).
|
|
\item Spatial interactions increase \textbf{after} the start of a synchronous modulation (\textbf{D}).
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{multicols}
|
|
\vspace{-1cm}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\myblock[TranspBlock]{Conclusion}{
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\setlength\itemsep{0.5em}
|
|
\item Our analysis is the first to indicate that \textit{A. leptorhynchus} uses long, diffuse and synchronized EOD$f$ signals to communicate in addition to chirps and rises.
|
|
\item The recorded fish do not exhibit jamming avoidance behavior while close during synchronous modulations.
|
|
\item Synchronous signals \textbf{initiate} spatio-temporal interactions.
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\vspace{0.2cm}
|
|
}
|
|
\end{columns}
|
|
|
|
\node [above right,
|
|
text=white,
|
|
outer sep=45pt,
|
|
minimum width=\paperwidth,
|
|
align=center,
|
|
draw,
|
|
fill=boxes,
|
|
color=boxes] at (-43.6,-61) {
|
|
\textcolor{white}{
|
|
\normalsize Contact: \{name\}.\{surname\}@student.uni-tuebingen.de}};
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|