j_hartling/paper_2025
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

added reference list and author affiliations

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jan Benda
2026-06-17 11:06:58 +02:00
parent 395cfb98ab
commit b90e1624f4
2 changed files with 9 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

BIN
main.pdf
View File

Binary file not shown.

14
main.tex
View File

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
% \crefname{equation}{Eq.}{Eqs.} % \crefname{equation}{Eq.}{Eqs.}
% \creflabelformat{equation}{#2#1#3} % \creflabelformat{equation}{#2#1#3}
\usepackage[ \usepackage[
backend=biber, backend=bibtex,
style=authoryear, style=authoryear,
pluralothers=true, pluralothers=true,
maxcitenames=1, maxcitenames=1,
@@ -34,14 +34,16 @@
%\citation %\citation
\title{Emergent intensity invariance vs. signal-to-noise ratio at three consecutive processing stages along the grasshopper song recognition pathway} \title{Emergent intensity invariance vs. signal-to-noise ratio at three consecutive processing stages along the grasshopper song recognition pathway}
\author{Jona Hartling, Jan Benda} \author{Jona Hartling$^1$, Ale\v{s} \v{S}korjanc$^2$, Jan Benda$^{1,3}$}
\date{} \date{$^1$ Institute for Neurobiology, Eberhard Karls Universität, 72076 Tübingen, Germany \\
$^2$ Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ve\v{c}na pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia\\
$^3$ Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany}
\begin{document} \begin{document}
\maketitle{} \maketitle{}
% Text references and citations: % Text references and citations:
\newcommand{\bcite}[1]{\mbox{\cite{#1}}} \newcommand{\bcite}[1]{\cite{#1}}
% \newcommand{\fref}[1]{\mbox{\cref{#1}}} % \newcommand{\fref}[1]{\mbox{\cref{#1}}}
% \newcommand{\fref}[1]{\mbox{Fig.\,\ref{#1}}} % \newcommand{\fref}[1]{\mbox{Fig.\,\ref{#1}}}
% \newcommand{\eref}[1]{\mbox{\cref{#1}}} % \newcommand{\eref}[1]{\mbox{\cref{#1}}}
@@ -182,7 +184,7 @@ the signal, and the vegetation of the habitat~(\bcite{michelsen1978sound}).
Sound attenuation has two major consequences for song recognition. First, the Sound attenuation has two major consequences for song recognition. First, the
amplitude dynamics of the song pattern degrade with increasing distance to the amplitude dynamics of the song pattern degrade with increasing distance to the
sender, which limits the effective communication range of grasshoppers sender, which limits the effective communication range of grasshoppers
to~\mbox{1\,-\,2\,m} in their typical grassland to~\mbox{1\,--\,2\,m} in their typical grassland
habitats~(\bcite{lang2000acoustic}). Second, the intensity of a song at the habitats~(\bcite{lang2000acoustic}). Second, the intensity of a song at the
receiver's position varies with the position of the sender, which should receiver's position varies with the position of the sender, which should
ideally not affect song recognition. The auditory system thus needs to achieve ideally not affect song recognition. The auditory system thus needs to achieve
@@ -1925,6 +1927,8 @@ habitat.
% - How to integrate the available knowledge on anatomy, physiology, ethology?\\ % - How to integrate the available knowledge on anatomy, physiology, ethology?\\
% $\rightarrow$ Abstract, simplify, formalize $\rightarrow$ Functional model framework % $\rightarrow$ Abstract, simplify, formalize $\rightarrow$ Functional model framework
\printbibliography
\newpage \newpage
\section{Appendix} \section{Appendix}