Syncing to home.
This commit is contained in:
83
main.tex
83
main.tex
@@ -81,60 +81,61 @@ distributed accumulation of anatomical, physiological and ethological evidence.
|
||||
This process is undoubtedly without alternative; however, it leaves us with the
|
||||
challenge of integrating the available fragments into a coherent whole in order
|
||||
to address issues such as the interaction between individual system components,
|
||||
the functional limitations of the system overall, or taxonomic comparisons of
|
||||
systems that process the same sensory modality. Any unified framework that
|
||||
captures the essential functional aspects of a given sensory system thus has
|
||||
the potential to deepen our current understanding and fasciliate systematic
|
||||
the functional limitations of the system overall, or taxonomic comparisons
|
||||
between systems that process the same sensory modality. Any unified framework
|
||||
that captures the essential functional aspects of a given sensory system thus
|
||||
has the potential to deepen our current understanding and fasciliate systematic
|
||||
investigations. However, building such a framework is a challenging task. It
|
||||
requires a wealth of existing knowledge of the system and the signals it
|
||||
operates on, a clearly defined scope, and careful reduction, abstraction, and
|
||||
formalization of the underlying anatomical structures and physiological
|
||||
mechanisms.
|
||||
formalization of the underlying structures and mechanisms.
|
||||
|
||||
One sensory system about which extensive information has been gathered over the
|
||||
years is the auditory system of grasshoppers~(\textit{Acrididae}). Grasshoppers
|
||||
rely on auditory processing primarily for intraspecific communication, which
|
||||
rely on their sense of hearing primarily for intraspecific communication, which
|
||||
includes mate attraction and evaluation~(\bcite{helversen1972gesang}), sender
|
||||
localization~(\bcite{helversen1988interaural}), courtship display~(SOURCE),
|
||||
rival deterrence~(\bcite{greenfield1993acoustic}), and loss-of-signal predator
|
||||
alarm~(SOURCE). The different behavioral contexts are met with
|
||||
alarm~(SOURCE). In accordance with this rich behavioral repertoire,
|
||||
grasshoppers have evolved a variety of sound production mechanisms to generate
|
||||
acoustic communication signals for different contexts and ranges using their
|
||||
wings, hindlegs, or mandibles~(\bcite{otte1970comparative}). Among the most
|
||||
conspicuous acoustic signals of grasshoppers are the species-specific calling
|
||||
songs, which broadcast the presence of the singing individual --- usually the
|
||||
males of a species --- to potential mates within range. These songs are usually
|
||||
more characteristic of a species than morphological traits.
|
||||
|
||||
Different acustic signals are used for different behavioral
|
||||
contexts and communication ranges
|
||||
This reliance on species-specific acoustic signals for mediating
|
||||
reproduction represents a strong evolutionary driving force, that resulted in a
|
||||
massive species diversification~(\bcite{vedenina2011speciation},
|
||||
\bcite{sevastianov2023evolution}).
|
||||
|
||||
Depending on the behavioral context and the communication range,
|
||||
The characteristic calling songs are
|
||||
produced by stridulation, during which the grasshopper pulls the serrated
|
||||
stridulatory file on its hindlegs across a resonating vein on the
|
||||
forewings~(\bcite{helversen1977stridulatory},
|
||||
\bcite{helversen1997recognition}).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Grasshoppers generate their most conspicious acoustic signals
|
||||
---~commonly referred to as "songs"~--- by stridulation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Different acoustic signals may be generated using different
|
||||
body parts ---~wings, hindlegs, or mandibles~---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Different acoustic signals may be generated using different
|
||||
body parts ---~wings, hindlegs, or mandibles~--- but the most conspicious
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The required acoustic signals for different contexts and ranges
|
||||
may be generated using different body parts ---~wings, hindlegs, or
|
||||
mandibles~--- but the most common sound production mechanism is stridulation,
|
||||
during which the animal pulls the serrated stridulatory file on its hindlegs
|
||||
across a resonating vein on the forewings. The resulting "songs"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The reliance on acoustic communication signals represents a strong evolutionary
|
||||
driving force, that resulted in a massive species diversification among
|
||||
grasshoppers~(\bcite{vedenina2011speciation},
|
||||
Such elaborate acoustic behaviors co-depend not only on
|
||||
reliable auditory perception but also on suitable acoustic signals for
|
||||
different contexts and ranges. To this end, grasshoppers have evolved a variety
|
||||
of sound production mechanisms using their wings, hindlegs, or
|
||||
mandibles~(\bcite{otte1970comparative}). The most conspicuous acoustic signals
|
||||
--- the characteristic calling songs --- are produced by stridulation, during
|
||||
which the grasshopper pulls the serrated stridulatory file on its hindlegs
|
||||
across a resonating vein on the forewings~(\bcite{helversen1977stridulatory},
|
||||
\bcite{helversen1997recognition}). The reliance on species-specific acoustic
|
||||
communication signals represents a strong evolutionary driving force, that
|
||||
resulted in a massive species diversification~(\bcite{vedenina2011speciation},
|
||||
\bcite{sevastianov2023evolution}).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Grasshoppers produce their most conspicious acoustic signals
|
||||
---~commonly referred to as "songs"~--- by stridulation, during which the
|
||||
animal rubs the serrated stridulatory file on its hindleg across a resonating
|
||||
vein on the forewing.
|
||||
The most conspicuous acoustic signals
|
||||
--- the characteristic calling songs --- are produced by stridulation, during
|
||||
which the grasshopper pulls the serrated stridulatory file on its hindlegs
|
||||
across a resonating vein on the forewings~(\bcite{helversen1977stridulatory},
|
||||
\bcite{helversen1997recognition}). Grasshopper songs are species-specific,
|
||||
amplitude-modulated (AM) broad-band acoustic signals
|
||||
|
||||
Among the several thousand recognized grasshopper
|
||||
species~(\bcite{cigliano2018orthoptera}), diverse species-specific sound
|
||||
@@ -148,6 +149,10 @@ Strong dependence on acoustic signals for ranged communication\\
|
||||
- Mate attraction/evaluation, rival deterrence, loss-of-signal predator alarm\\
|
||||
$\rightarrow$ Elaborate acoustic behaviors co-depend on reliable auditory perception
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Songs = Amplitude-modulated (AM) broad-band acoustic signals\\
|
||||
- Generated by stridulatory movement of hindlegs against forewings\\
|
||||
- Shorter time scales: Characteristic temporal waveform pattern\\
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user