diff --git a/main.tex b/main.tex
index 4e917dc..496e02d 100644
--- a/main.tex
+++ b/main.tex
@@ -804,22 +804,67 @@ Bottom: Using the difference in coding fraction instead of the quotient makes th
  \caption{This is about frequency and how it determines $delta_cf$. In other paper I have used $quot_cf$. \notedh{The x-axis labels don't make sense to me. Left is broad and right is narrow? }}
 \end{figure}
 
-\subsection{Discussion}
+\begin{figure}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_50_100/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_50_100/averaged_4parts.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_50_100/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf}
+ \label{experiments_narrow_50_100}
+ \caption{Experimental data for a signal with a lower cutoff frequency of 50Hz and an upper cutoff of 100Hz. 
+ A: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Cells are grouped in quartiles according to $\sigma$.
+ B: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Each curve shows an average over the cells in one panel of A. Shaded area shows the standard deviation.
+ C: Increase in coding fraction for N=1 to N=64 as a function of $\sigma$. The y-axis shows the quotient of coding fraction at N=64 divided by coding fraction at N=1.
+ D: Same as C, only with the difference instead of the quotient.
+ }
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_150_200/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_150_200/averaged_4parts.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_150_200/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf}
+ \label{experiments_narrow_150_200}
+ \caption{Experimental data for a signal with a lower cutoff frequency of 150Hz and an upper cutoff of 200Hz. 
+ A: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Cells are grouped in quartiles according to $\sigma$.
+ B: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Each curve shows an average over the cells in one panel of A. Shaded area shows the standard deviation.
+ C: Increase in coding fraction for N=1 to N=64 as a function of $\sigma$. The y-axis shows the quotient of coding fraction at N=64 divided by coding fraction at N=1.
+ D: Same as C, only with the difference instead of the quotient.
+ }
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_250_300/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_250_300/averaged_4parts.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_250_300/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf}
+ \label{experiments_narrow_250_300}
+ \caption{Experimental data for a signal with a lower cutoff frequency of 250Hz and an upper cutoff of 300Hz. 
+ A: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Cells are grouped in quartiles according to $\sigma$.
+ B: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Each curve shows an average over the cells in one panel of A. Shaded area shows the standard deviation.
+ C: Increase in coding fraction for N=1 to N=64 as a function of $\sigma$. The y-axis shows the quotient of coding fraction at N=64 divided by coding fraction at N=1.
+ D: Same as C, only with the difference instead of the quotient.
+ }
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_350_400/2_by_2_overview.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_350_400/averaged_4parts.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_sigma_quot_firing_rate.pdf}
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth]{img/experiments/narrow_350_400/scatter_and_fits_sigma_diff_firing_rate.pdf}
+ \label{experiments_narrow_350_400}
+ \caption{Experimental data for a signal with a lower cutoff frequency of 350Hz and an upper cutoff of 400Hz. 
+ A: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Cells are grouped in quartiles according to $\sigma$.
+ B: Coding fraction as a function of population size. Each curve shows an average over the cells in one panel of A. Shaded area shows the standard deviation.
+ C: Increase in coding fraction for N=1 to N=64 as a function of $\sigma$. The y-axis shows the quotient of coding fraction at N=64 divided by coding fraction at N=1.
+ D: Same as C, only with the difference instead of the quotient.
+ }
+\end{figure}
+
 
-We also confirmed that the results from the theory part of the paper play a role in a 
-real world example. Inside the brain of the weakly electric fish 
-\textit{Apteronotus leptorhynchus} pyramidal cells in different areas 
-are responsible for encoding different frequencies. In each of those areas,
-cells integrate over different numbers of the same receptor cells. 
-Artificial populations consisting of different trials of the same receptor cell
-show what we have seen in our simulations: Larger populations help
-especially with the encoding of high frequency signals. These results
-are in line with what is known about the pyramidal cells of \lepto:
-The cells which encode high frequency signals best are the cells which
-integrate over the largest number of neurons.
 
 \section{Literature}
 
+
 \clearpage
 \bibliography{citations.bib}