benda/susceptibility1
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

some notes in the intro

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jan Grewe 2024-05-27 14:44:45 +02:00
parent ad6293fee9
commit a488244af7
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
susceptibility1.tex
View File

@ -514,7 +514,6 @@
\notejg{Cite Schlungbaum in introduction}
\section*{Introduction}
%with nonlinearities being observed in all sensory modalities
@ -523,7 +522,7 @@ Nonlinear processes are key to neuronal information processing. Decision making
\notejb{Wo genau soll die Einleitung hinzielen? Das ist bis jetzt eine Ansammlung von Aussagen zum Thema nonlinearities und irgendwie schleicht sich da der Fisch noch rein.}
\notejb{What are the main findings of the manuscript? (i) 2nd order susceptibility can be measured using RAM stimuli, (ii) we see a bit of nonlinearity in low-CV P-units and strong one in ampullary cells. (iii) There is an estimation problem because of low N and RAM stimulus introducing linearizing noise. (iii) noise split gives a good estimate that translates well to pure sine wave stimulation.}
\notejb{What are the main findings of the manuscript? (i) 2nd order susceptibility can be measured using RAM stimuli, (ii) we see a bit of nonlinearity in low-CV P-units and strong one in ampullary cells. (ii) We find stuff, that matches the theoretical predictions (Voronekov) (iii) AMs with carrier (auditory) (iv) There is an estimation problem because of low N and RAM stimulus introducing linearizing noise. (v) noise split gives a good estimate that translates well to pure sine wave stimulation.}
\notejb{Strong aspects are (i) how to estimate 2nd order susceptibilities, (ii) what do they tell us about relevant stimuli, (iii) nonlinearities show up only for very specific frequencies}