53 lines
2.2 KiB
TeX
53 lines
2.2 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
|
|
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage{textcomp}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
|
|
\usepackage[ngerman,english]{babel}
|
|
|
|
\usepackage[left=25mm, right=25mm, top=20mm, bottom=20mm]{geometry}
|
|
\setlength{\parskip}{2ex}
|
|
|
|
\usepackage[mediumqspace,Gray,squaren]{SIunits} % \ohm, \micro
|
|
|
|
\usepackage{natbib}
|
|
%\bibliographystyle{jneurosci}
|
|
|
|
\usepackage[breaklinks=true,bookmarks=true,bookmarksopen=true,pdfpagemode=UseNone,pdfstartview=FitH,colorlinks=true,citecolor=blue,urlcolor=blue]{hyperref}
|
|
|
|
\newcommand{\issue}[1]{\textbf{#1}}
|
|
\newcommand{\issueg}[1]{\foreignlanguage{ngerman}{\textbf{#1}}}
|
|
\newcounter{responsecounter}
|
|
\newcommand{\response}[1]{\refstepcounter{responsecounter}\begin{quote}\arabic{responsecounter}. #1\end{quote}}
|
|
\newcommand{\note}[2][]{\textcolor{red!80!black}{\textbf{[#1: #2]}}}
|
|
\newcommand{\notejb}[1]{\note[JB]{#1}}
|
|
\newcommand{\notejg}[1]{\note[JG]{#1}}
|
|
\newcommand{\notesr}[1]{\note[SR]{#1}}
|
|
|
|
\newcommand{\changed}[1]{\textcolor{blue!50!black}{#1}}
|
|
|
|
\setlength{\parindent}{0em}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your final positive assessment of our manuscript.
|
|
|
|
\issue{\large Reviewer \#1}
|
|
|
|
\issue{Line 18 In the abstract the sentence "...only in individual low-noise P-units, but in more than half of the ampullary cells". is not quite clear. Please rephrase.}
|
|
|
|
\issue{\large Reviewer \#2}
|
|
|
|
\issue{The authors have done an excellent job of responding to my comments. I will note that the line numbers referenced in the response letter are incorrect, which made it challenging to review these changes. However, I have just one remaining minor comment. In the abstract, line 18, the wording is still unclear. "...more than half of the ampullary cells" is clear, but "...only in individual low-noise P-units" is not. Why not precisely state that these predicted nonlinear responses were observed in X out of Y P-units?}
|
|
|
|
\response{We have rephrased this sentence as requested: ``In our
|
|
combined experimental and modeling approach we identify these
|
|
predicted nonlinear responses in those 31 out of 172 P-units that
|
|
are characterized by low intrinsic noise. In contrast, the majority
|
|
(22 out of 30) ampullary cells show nonlinear responses.''}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|