added Caputis papers

rebuttal2.tex

@@ -76,7 +76,16 @@
   strengthen the links between well-written theoretical analysis and
   the practical field of experimental physiology.}
 
-\response{READ PAPERS AND CITE THEM}
+\response{READ PAPERS AND CITE THEM You are right, there are more
+  nonlinear mechanisms potentially contributiong to the threshold
+  nonlinearity. We now mention this in the methods when introducing
+  the threshold nonlinearity (after eq. 13) and cite the corresponding
+  manuscripts. We also added a paragraph to the methods reiterating
+  what we have in the discusssion, that the details of this
+  nonlinearity are not so important in the context of the present
+  manuscript, since we compute all cross-spectra between the resulting
+  amplitude modulation and the spikes responses. MAYBE ALSO IN THE
+  CONCLUSION.}
 
 \issue{Second, and along the same lines, the discussion could be
   improved by mentioning the effects and significance of these
@@ -85,7 +94,7 @@
   interference avoidance responses, and b) transient changes, as in
   chirps.}
 
-\response{THINK ABOUT IT AND ADD TO DISCUSSION}
+\response{HERE: STATIONARY ANALYSIS, CHIRPS ARE TRANSIENT, NEEDS RESEARCH. JAR SIGNALS are slow but change continously so they might hit the baseline frequency Add something somewhere around line 660.}
 
 \issue{Finally, the precise description of the methods could be
   expanded for reaching a broader biology audience; in particular, the
@@ -109,7 +118,11 @@
   between the extreme profiles of P (signal amplitude) and T (signal
   slope)?}
 
-\response{SAY SOMETHING ABOUT T-UNITS AND THAT WE DEFINITELY EXCLUDED THEM}
+\response{In \textit{Apteronotus} T-units are characterized by 1:1
+  locking to the EOD, i.e. by having a baseline firing rate matching
+  the EOD frequency. We definitely have no T-units in our data
+  set. This we eplain now in the ``Identification of P-units and
+  ampullary cells'' section in the methods.}
 
 \issue{In line 147, rather than using the term
   "laterally," I believe it would enhance clarity to state "parallel
@@ -124,7 +137,7 @@
   field foveal perioral region where the majority of receptors are
   located.}
 
-\response{ADD SOMETHING TO STIMULATION SECTION}
+\response{ADD SOMETHING TO STIMULATION SECTION LINE 110}
 
 \issue{Line 148, the phrase "band limited white noise" lacks
   clarity. Upon my initial reading, I assumed that the cutoff limit